Oat
Growing Period | Type | Annual or Perennial | Drought Tolerance | Shade Tolerance | Salinity Tolerance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cool Season | Grass | Annual | Low | Intolerant | Moderate |
Common Name
Scientific Name
Cultivar
The Southern Seedsmen's 1990-91 Directory and Buyers' Guide listed 43 oat varieties as being commercially available. Few varieties of barley or oat are adapted coast to coast (Stoskopf, 1985).
Oat varieties have been changed rapidly in response to development of new strains of pathogens (Coffman, 1977). However, modern oat cultivars show only minor improvements over older varieties. There has been some improvement in root development (Stoskopf, 1985).
'California Red' oat shows a fine growth and is the standard for hay production. However, the fine growth that makes it good for hay also renders it susceptible to lodging and unsuitable for supporting intercropped vetches. It is a late-maturing cultivar, about 13 days later than cv 'Montezuma' (Fred Thomas, pers. comm.).
Cv 'Cayuse' shows coarse growth and 14% higher biomass production on the average than 'California Red.' 'Cayuse' matures in early June, about 20 days after cv 'Montezuma' (Fred Thomas, pers. comm.).
Cv 'Montezuma' matures early, from early to mid-May, with flowering beginning about a month earlier. Fine stems make this variety less suited for intercropping with vetches. Biomass production is about 93% of that of cv 'California Red (Fred Thomas, pers. comm.).'
'Ogle' is a cultivar of oat resistant to barley yellow dwarf virus (Schonbeck, 1988). It shows coarse growth, high biomass production, and is regarded as an early-maturing form of cv 'Cayuse,' maturing ten days after cv 'Montezuma' (Fred Thomas, pers. comm.).
Seed Description
Seedling Description
Mature Plant Description
Temperature
Oat shows moderate resistance to cold (Madson, 1951). Winter forms of oat are not as cold hardy as rye, triticale, wheat (Stoskopf, 1985), or barley (Miller, 1984d). A temperature of -8 degrees Centigrade is required to kill seedlings of oat or barley (Stoskopf, 1985). Miller (1984d) considered that oat is not as drought or cold resistant as barley, rye, or wheat (Miller, 1984d).
Oat grows best in cool, moist climates, yet it is adapted to many climatic extremes. It is an excellent winter cover crop in the South and in areas where winter freezes are not severe (McLeod, 1982).
Oat is susceptible to damage by hot, dry weather that occurs during reproduction (Stoskopf, 1985). The best areas for oat production have relatively cool summers (Coffman, 1977).
In the Northeast, oat is a common late-summer-sown cover crop which winterkills, leaving a protective dead mulch that is easily incorporated in the spring (Schonbeck, 1988).
Geographic Range
Oat originated in North Africa, the Near East, and temperate Russia (McLeod, 1982), and the best areas for oat production have relatively cool summers (Coffman, 1977). Few varieties of oat are adapted coast to coast (Stoskopf, 1985). Oat is not as drought or cold resistant as barley, rye, or wheat (Miller, 1984).
The common oat varieties used in temperate and mountain areas, including in the U.S.A., were derived from wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Algerian oat and red oat varieties are derived from Avena byzantina K. Koch, whereas a few drought-tolerant varieties are derived from slender oat (Avena barbata Brot.) (Hitchcock, 1971). Munz (1973) mentioned that in California, cultivated oat is an occasional escape from cultivation, and that slender wild oat (Avena barbata Brot.) is a common weed in waste fields and open slopes, whereas wild oat (Avena fatua L.) is a common weed of waste and cultivated areas. Wild oat does best on rich soils, whereas slender wild oat is tolerant of a variety of soils (Crampton, 1974).
Water
Nutrients
Soil pH
Soil Type
Oat can be grown on loam to heavy soil types (Madson, 1951) and is regarded as not being particular as to soil (Johnny's Selected Seeds, 1983) because it is adapted to many soil types.
Oat is more tolerant of wet soil than is barley. Under moderate fertility and drainage oat tolerates a finer soil texture than does wheat or barley (McLeod, 1982).
Salinity Tolerance
Life Cycle
Seeding Rate
Seeding Depth
Seeding Method
Seeding Dates
Inoculation
Seed Availability
Days to Flowering
Days to Maturity
Seed Production
- 'Swan': 3,250 lb/a
- 'Montezuma': 3,480
- 'Sierra': 3,630
- 'California Red': 1710
- 'Curt': 1,600
- 'Cayuse': 3,740
Seed Storage
Growth Habit
Maximum Height
Root System
Oat has a fibrous root system (Bugg, pers. comm.).
Kutschera (1960) reported that oat generally roots to a depth of 84-195 cm and wild oat (Avena fatua generally roots to a depth of 91-160 cm.
Establishment
Maintenance
Incorporation
Harvesting
Uses
Mixtures
Oat can be seeded into the sod of bermuda grass (Miller, 1984).
Monocultures of oat (Avena sativa, cv 'Mulga') or triticale yielded more dry matter and digestible organic matter than did bicultures involving common vetch (Vicia sativa) or pea (Pisum sativum). Yields of mixtures did exceed those of monocultures of the relevant legumes. Digestibility and crude protein content were highest in mixtures of peas and triticale. There appears little incentive for farmers to grow mixtures of annual legumes and small-grained cereals for forage production (Droushiotis, 1989).
Biomass
N Contribution
Oat, a fibrous-rooted cool-season grass, is sometimes used as a catch crop to retain soil N that otherwise might leach through the profile as nitrate (Bugg, pers. comm.). Mean nitrogen content of oat is 12 lb/a, according to Brinton (1989). In an experiment on rotational cash crops ("break crops") for wheat farmers, fertilizer N requirements were increased by 10 kg/ha following winter oat, decreased by 30 kg/ha following winter rape, winter peas, spring faba beans, or cultivated fallow, and decreased by 40 kg/ha following spring peas (McEwen et al., 1989).
Incorporation of non-legume (high C:N ratio) residues (e.g., corn) led to depression of N availability greater than that for surface residues. N availability was in this order for crop residues: alfalfa > peanut > soybean > oat > sorghum > wheat > corn (Smith and Sharpley, 1990).
Barley, oat, and wheat-straw mulches were tested in field trials in eastern Quebec forest plantations. The mulches reduced soil nitrification, apparently through the production of five phenolic acids. Growth rate and foliar nitrogen content were higher for black-spruce seedlings with mulches. There were no other significant differences in nutrient status (Jobidon et al., 1989b).
Quemada and Cabrera (1995a) reported the following:
Cover Crop | C/N | % N mineralized in 160 days |
---|---|---|
Crimson Clover (leaves) | 10.1 | 61.4 |
Crimson Clover (stems) | 31.9 | 29 |
Cereal Rye (leaves) | 28.9 | 32.6 |
Cereal Rye (stems) | 98.9 | -32.3 |
Oat (leaves) | 12.8 | 46.8 |
Oat (stems) | 78.8 | -33.2 |
These data for residues left on the soil surface reflect the slower breakdown of stems, and the immobilization of N caused by application of materials with high C/N ratios.
Quemada and Cabrera (1995a) also evaluated the relative allocation of carbon to soluble compounds, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, which have profoundly differing rates of decomposition, with the list given in descending order of rate of breakdown. For all three plant species mentioned, stems had much higher concentrations of lignin than did leaves.
Using the CERES-N submodel, Quemada and Cabrera (1995b) further explored the release of N from no-till cover crop residues, deriving decay rate constants from breakdown rates for stems, leaves, and mixtures of both. The constants that best fitted the data were 0.14-day for cellulose; decay rate for lignin was assumed to be 0.00095-day. That is each day, more than 10% of the soluble carbohydrate pool degrades to CO2, about 0.34% of the cellulose pool degrades, and less than 0.1% of the lignin.
Quemada and Cabrera (1995b) in Georgia used the CERES-N model to predict conditions for leaves or stems or 50:50 by dry weight mixtures of crimson clover, cereal rye, oat, and wheat harvested at maturity. All crop residue was cut into 1-cm pieces and placed atop sandy loam soil that had previously been managed without tillage. Incubation was in acrylic plastic cylinders at 35° and 98% RH, for 160 days. The study was replicated three times. Observed N-mineralization was slower than previously reported for incorporated residues:
Pool | Decay Rate Constant |
---|---|
Carbohydrate | 0.14/day |
Cellulose | 0.0023/day-0.0034/day |
Humus native to the soil was estimated to mineralize N at 0.00042/day.
Reported C/N ratios were:
Crop | Leaves | Stems | 50/50 By-dry wt. mix of leaves & stems |
---|---|---|---|
Crimson clover | 10.1 | 31.9 | 15.2 |
Cereal rye | 28.9 | 98.9 | 44.7 |
Wheat | 13.1 | 86.5 | 22.9 |
Oat | 12.8 | 78.8 | 21.7 |
Hu et al. (1997) conducted a replicated field study at the Student Experimental Farm (SEF) and the Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems (SAFS) Project, U.C. Davis, CA. The study compared carbon and nitrogen transformations following cover crop incorporation on organically vs. conventionally managed Yolo sandy loam (at SEF: coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, thermic Mollic Xerofluvent) and Reiff sandy loam soil (at SAFS: coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, thermic Mollic Xerofluvent) Chemical characteristics for the oat and woollypod vetch harvested on April 14 and used as cover crops were as follows (±S.E.M., where indicated):
Cover Crop | C/N | C | N | Cellulose | Lignin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oat | 33.6 | 412±3 g/kg | 12.3±0.4 g/kg | 349±2.2 g/kg | 43±0.8 g/kg |
Woollypod Vetch | 13.3 | 427±3 g/kg | 32±0.9 g/kg | 288±3.7 g/kg | 84±1.1 g/kg |
Prior to incorporation of cover crops, soil organic N and soil organic C were significantly higher in organically managed than in conventionally managed plots, both at SEF and at SAFS. These differences were lessened or obscured during the 35 days following incorporation. Microbial biomass C was initially greater under organic management at both sites; again, differences were obscured following cover crop incorporation. Cover crop debris buried in litter bags in the SAFS plots showed more rapid disappearance in organic than in conventional plots.
Quemada and Cabrera (1995a) in Georgia found that chemical composition of various winter-annual plants varied in their chemical composition and in their decomposition rates when managed without tillage. In addition, leaves consistently varied from stems in having greater C/N ratios and lignin and cellulose contents (the latter two expressed as g/kg of plant material). Based on CO2 emissions and N mineralized, stems decomposed more slowly than leaves for crimson clover, cereal rye, wheat, and oat.
Wander and Traina (1996a) reported that in the replicate Farming Systems Trial at Rodale Institute Research Center (Kutztown, PA), cover-crop based cash grain production led to significantly higher values than synthetic fertilizer-based cash grain production for the following categories of soil carbon and nitrogen: total C, humic C, humic substance C and N, and light-fraction C and N (all based on g/kg soil).
Non-N Nutrient Contribution
Effects on Soil
In the Northeast, oat is a common late-summer-sown cover crop which winterkills, leaving a protective dead mulch that is easily incorporated in the spring (Schonbeck, 1988).
Hu et al. (1997) conducted a replicated field study at the Student Experimental Farm (SEF) and the Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems (SAFS) Project, U.C. Davis, CA. The study compared carbon and nitrogen transformations following cover crop incorporation on organically vs. conventionally managed Yolo sandy loam (at SEF: coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, thermic Mollic Xerofluvent) and Reiff sandy loam soil (at SAFS: coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, thermic Mollic Xerofluvent) Chemical characteristics for the oat and woollypod vetch harvested on April 14 and used as cover crops were as follows (±S.E.M., where indicated):
Cover Crop | C/N | C | N | Cellulose | Lignin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oat | 33.6 | 412±3 g/kg | 12.3±0.4 g/kg | 349±2.2 g/kg | 43±0.8 g/kg |
Woollypod Vetch | 13.3 | 427±3 g/kg | 32±0.9 g/kg | 288±3.7 g/kg | 84±1.1 g/kg |
Effects on Livestock
Pest Effects, Insects
Pest Effects, Diseases
Seeding depth for barley or oat should be no greater than 5 cm (2 in.). Shallow seeding is possible in areas with high soil moisture and leads to more rapid emergence and lessened incidence of root rot disease (Stoskopf, 1985).
Winter oat, winter rape, winter peas, and spring faba beans as break crops greatly reduced the incidence of take-all of wheat (Gaeumannomyces graminis) (McEwen et al., 1989).
Pest Effects, Weeds
Inclusion of barley, oat, or rye in a mix of cover crops along with vetches and bell beans appears to reduce infestation by common fiddleneck (Amsinckia intermedia) (Bugg, 1990). Oat can be used as a nurse crop in combination with slow-establishing legumes like white and yellow sweet clovers or sourclover (Duke, 1981). This can help reduce weed problems (Bugg, pers. comm.). W.T. Lanini reported that oat grown as an intercrop suppresses weeds in seeded or established alfalfa (pers. comm.). Oat is usually preferred instead of barley as a companion crop; barley is usually more competitive than oat (Stoskopf, 1985).
Barley, oat, and wheat-straw mulches were tested in eastern Quebec forest plantations of balsam fir/birch. The mulches inhibited red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and reduced mean weed cover by 41%, apparently through the production of five phenolic acids (Jobidon et al., 1989a).
In a replicated study (r=4) at Blue Heron Vineyard (Fetzer Vineyards), Hopland, Mendocino County, California, cover crops were seeded in late October, 1990; harvest was on May 15-16, 1991. Dominant winter annual weeds were chickweed, shepherds purse, rattail fescue, and annual ryegrass. Weed above-ground dry biomass in plots sown to 'California Red' oat was 0.241+/- 0.083 Mg/ha (Mean +/- S.E.M.) (4.9% of the weed biomass in unseeded control plots). This was not deemed significantly different than the weed biomasses obtained with 'U.C. 476' barley (0.043 +/- 0.043) Mg/ha or 'Merced' cereal rye (0.031 +/- 0.031 Mg/ha). Vegetational cover by oat during early May was 98.75+/-1.25 % Vegetational Cover (Mean +/- S.E.M.) (Bugg et al., unpublished data).