|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spring, 1991 (v3n3)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drought
& Sustainability
by Dave Chaney & Chuck Ingels, SAREP
The current drought, possibly more than any other issue this century,
raises serious questions about the sustainability of California
agriculture. Concerns about economic viability, food safety,
groundwater contamination, and farm labor health and safety have
motivated both researchers and farmers to develop more environmentally
sound, resource-enhancing production systems. But none of these
can match the implications, anxiety and urgency of a severe drought.
Surface water supplies are the hardest hit and farmers in many
irrigation districts are already feeling the pinch. Growers in
some locations will receive 25 percent or less of their normal
deliveries. The ramifications of these restrictions depend on
the crop grown and on whether other sources of water are available.
It is likely that in some areas, the acreage planted to field
and vegetable crops will be drastically reduced. Already established
orchards and vineyards require a certain amount of water to stay
alive, but the chances of actually harvesting tree or vine crops
will depend on growers being able to locate other sources of water.
Groundwater is the major alternative to decreasing surface supplies,
but drilling a well can be very costly and take up to six weeks
or more. Furthermore, as farmers increase groundwater pumping
or drill additional wells the depth to groundwater gradually increases.
This adds to the expense of drilling a well and compounds the
groundwater overdraft problem. (Overdraft occurs when more
groundwater is pumped than is replaced each year by percolation.)
Among the side effects of overdrafts are the increased cost of
pumping water and declining water quality.
Another reason the drought is a focal point for agricultural sustainability
is the increasing tension between urban/industrial demands
for water and agriculture. An indicator of this can be seen in
estimates for changes in water use between the years 1985 and
2010 (Table 1). Overall, the demand for water is expected to
increase by 4.2 percent during this period, largely in the urban
sector.
Source: California Dept. of Water Resources Bulletin 160-87
Population growth in California will significantly increase municipal
and industrial demands. In contrast, net water use in agriculture
is estimated to decline slightly. This is based on the assumption
that California agriculture may become somewhat less competitive
in national and international markets. Water officials estimate
that the demand in the year 2010 will outstrip supply by about
2.1 million acre feet. In a serious drought situation this deficit
would be even greater.
The prospect of a very long-term drought compounds the problem
even further. Historical data shows that we are faced with the
distinct possibility of continued below average rainfall.
In 1980 the California Department of Water Resources funded a
study by the University of Arizona's Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research
that showed a 50-year drought during the late 1700s and early
1800s (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Long Term Reconstructed California Precipitation
not available
Precipitation was lower in each of these years than during the
dry seven-year span from 1928 through 1934 which the DWR uses
for planning projects with sufficient capacity to furnish a reliable
water supply. Thus, California's water planning may be based
on relatively optimistic estimates of drought conditions. (Association
of California Water Agencies, 1989)
Another long dry period identified in the tree ring study included
a 20-year period between 1865 and 1885, which wiped out the cattle
industry in Southern California. Even if average or high rainfall
years punctuate long drought periods, the basic problem remains:
How to meet the water demands of agriculture and a growing population
with limited supplies. Water Wise Farmers
What can farmers and ranchers do to make the most of limited water
supplies and increase the stability of their farming systems during
drought periods? Based on recommendations by University of California
researchers, there are several key points that apply to all farmers
and ranchers. These include:
Field, Vegetable Crops
In conjunction with the principles outlined above, there are three
additional recommendations that apply specifically to annual cropping
systems.
Tree Crops
"Tree growers have more potential to minimize adverse effects
of deficit irrigation on crop production than do field and row
crop growers. This is due mostly to the greater separation between
the vegetative and reproductive growth stages in trees."
This is according to a document entitled Irrigation
Management for Fruit and Nut Trees Under 1991 Drought Conditions,
which is available through most farm advisor offices. The
author is Dave Goldhamer, extension specialist at Kearney
Agricultural Center, who has performed numerous water stress experiments
on other nut and tree crops. Goldhamer also wrote a more extensive
1989 UC publication, Drought Irrigation Strategies for Deciduous
Orchards.
There are specific periods in the growing season during which
applied water can be reduced or withheld from tree crops without
significant yield losses, according to Goldhamer. At other times,
deficit irrigation can result in substantial loss in yields in
either the current season, the following season, or both. These
critical periods vary with each tree species, and the 1991 report
suggests general strategies based on tree species. In general,
the drought-sensitive growth stages are early season (bud break
through fruit set), fruit growth and development, and postharvest.
Source: Drought Tips for Vegetable and Field Crop Production.
UC Agriculture and Natural Resources Leaflet No. 21466.
Early season. Early spring growth is needed to establish
the fruiting wood for the following year's crop. It is therefore
essential to supply adequate water early in the season; this is
done by starting the season with a nearly full soil water profile.
Fruit Growth and Development. Adequate water is required
during the rapid growth of fruits which exhibit a "double
sigmoid fruit development pattern," but stress can be imposed
during the "lag (stage 2) phase of growth." Generally,
nut growth is less sensitive to water stress than fruit growth,
but other yield and quality components may be affected.
Postharvest. With the exceptions of almond and apricot,
"the period after harvest is generally most water stress
tolerant."
Other considerations in a drought year include good irrigation
scheduling and proper irrigation system design, according to Goldhamer.
Also, young trees should be fully irrigated since the goal is
to maximize vegetative growth to bring trees into bearing early.
Finally, some growers may be considering very severe pruning
in order to simply keep their trees alive. This will greatly
reduce water use, but only at the expense of production for several
years. An even more drastic step would be to cut off all scaffold
branches at waist level, a practice known as "dehorning."
Goldhamer advises using this measure only if eight acre-inches
or less water are available for the season. This drastic step
would probably not be needed on pistachio or walnut, and trees
of some species, such as almond, may never recover to their full
size.
Almond Research. Critical information has recently been
developed on managing almonds with deficit irrigation. Terry
Prichard, water management specialist in Stockton recently
reported on first year results of a four-year irrigation study.
In this experiment, yield was not affected by up to 50 percent
deficit irrigation, although the number of stick-tight hulls at
harvest increased significantly. Similarly, in the first year
of an irrigation cutoff study performed by Goldhamer, hull-splitting
was reduced as the length of the preharvest water cutoff interval
in-creased. Yields of all cutoff treatments were similar, even
alter two years. However, withholding the postharvest irrigation
resulted in significantly lower yields in all the cutoff treatments
in the second year. Range, Pasture
The following tips are from an article by Plumas-Sierra counties
farm advisor Holly George (March 1991 newsletter):
Roots transport moisture and nutrients to growing plants. When
plants are overgrazed, root growth stops; when root growth stops,
leaf growth stops too.
Irrigated pasture management practices which encourage
root and leaf growth are the same practices which allow plants
to make the best use of soil moisture. They include:
Range and dry pasture forage production depends entirely
on natural moisture. Overgrazing during a drought does more damage
to perennial plants than during a season of normal moisture.
It reduces plant vigor, stops root and leaf growth, reduces ground
cover, and invites accelerated erosion. Once erosion begins,
it tends to get worse each year, further reducing plant vigor
and forage production. This process is difficult to reverse.
Rather than risk permanent damage to grazing resources:
Wildlife will suffer during a drought as much or more than
domestic livestock. The wildlife that shares your land is a valuable
natural resource. To help wildlife:
For more information concerning your crop, and soil and water
conditions, contact your local Cooperative Extension office and/or
the Soil Conservation Service office. References
Association of California Water Agencies. 1989. Coping With
Future Water Shortages: Lessons From California's Drought.
Bowers, Wilbur 0., Richard L. Snyder, Susan B. Southerd and Brenda
J. Lanini. 1989. Water-Holding Characteristics of California
Soils. UC ANR Publication No. 21463.
California Dept. of Water Resources. 1987. California Water:
Looking to the Future. Bulletin 160-87.
Coppock, Raymond. 1984. California's Groundwater Resource.
UC ANR Leaflet No. 21393.
Fritts, H.C. and G.A. Gordon. 1980. Annual Precipitation for
California Since 1600 Reconstructed From Western North American
Tree Rings. California Dept. of Water Resources Agreement
No. B53367.
George, Holly. March 1991. Agriculture and Natural Resources,
Cooperative Extension newsletter, Plumas-Sierra counties.
Goldhamer, David A. and Richard L. Snyder (eds.). 1989. Irrigation
Scheduling: A Guide for Efficient On-Farm Water Management. UC
ANR Publication No. 21454.
Goldhamer, David A. 1989. Drought Irrigation Strategies for
Deciduous Orchards. UC ANR Publication No. 21453.
Goldhamer, David A. 1991. Irrigation Management for Fruit and
Nut Trees Under 1991 Drought Conditions.
Hanson, Blaine and Warren Bendixen. 1991. Improving Irrigation
Water Management. University of California Irrigation Program,
UC Davis Dept. of Land, Air, and Water Resources.
Prichard, Terry. 1988. Agricultural Water Management in a
Dry Year. Snyder, Richard L., Stephen T. Grattan, and Larry Schwankl. 1989. Drought
Tips for Vegetable and Field Crop Production. UC ANR Leaflet
No. 21466. [ Back | Search | Feedback ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||